评分:
(3.4 分) 175 评分:
(3.4 分) 175 评分:
评语
„norm”
(Gast, 07.05.2012, 16:45 Uhr)
„”
(Gast, 27.04.2012, 18:45 Uhr)
„good, quite short. it would be nice to have some detail about how to make negatives at the start”
(Gast, 06.02.2012, 13:36 Uhr)
„é bom ”
(Gast, 02.02.2012, 22:04 Uhr)
„en parcourant lexilogos ”
(Gast, 31.10.2011, 13:31 Uhr)
„instructive”
(Gast, 27.09.2011, 18:02 Uhr)
„easy”
(Gast, 27.09.2011, 02:12 Uhr)
„foi desatento.”
(Gast, 15.05.2011, 16:25 Uhr)
„Okay. Could be better. Too short.”
(Gast, 11.12.2010, 06:45 Uhr)
„leuke test!!”
(Gast, 28.11.2010, 21:01 Uhr)
„No room for alternative answer, too rigid”
(Gast, 28.11.2010, 13:47 Uhr)
„I like it”
(Gast, 15.11.2010, 22:40 Uhr)
„interesting, but too easy”
(Gast, 15.11.2010, 08:31 Uhr)
„way to go”
(Gast, 30.06.2010, 18:09 Uhr)
„Great test!”
(Gast, 21.03.2010, 23:42 Uhr)
„carino”
(Gast, 13.12.2009, 18:24 Uhr)
„useful”
(Gast, 10.10.2009, 00:37 Uhr)
„hilfreich”
(Gast, 17.09.2009, 23:30 Uhr)
(Gast, 07.05.2012, 16:45 Uhr)
„
(Gast, 27.04.2012, 18:45 Uhr)
„good, quite short. it would be nice to have some detail about how to make negatives at the start”
(Gast, 06.02.2012, 13:36 Uhr)
„é bom ”
(Gast, 02.02.2012, 22:04 Uhr)
„en parcourant lexilogos ”
(Gast, 31.10.2011, 13:31 Uhr)
„instructive”
(Gast, 27.09.2011, 18:02 Uhr)
„easy”
(Gast, 27.09.2011, 02:12 Uhr)
„foi desatento.”
(Gast, 15.05.2011, 16:25 Uhr)
„Okay. Could be better. Too short.”
(Gast, 11.12.2010, 06:45 Uhr)
„leuke test!!”
(Gast, 28.11.2010, 21:01 Uhr)
„No room for alternative answer, too rigid”
(Gast, 28.11.2010, 13:47 Uhr)
„I like it”
(Gast, 15.11.2010, 22:40 Uhr)
„interesting, but too easy”
(Gast, 15.11.2010, 08:31 Uhr)
„way to go”
(Gast, 30.06.2010, 18:09 Uhr)
„Great test!”
(Gast, 21.03.2010, 23:42 Uhr)
„carino”
(Gast, 13.12.2009, 18:24 Uhr)
„useful”
(Gast, 10.10.2009, 00:37 Uhr)
„hilfreich”
(Gast, 17.09.2009, 23:30 Uhr)
